The multiple Apocalypse Now versions that have come out over the years have offered a lot of different ways to watch the acclaimed question as well as a lot of questions about which is the best version. Francis Ford Coppola's Vietnam War film stands out within the genre at least partly because of the different versions that exist and the debate that has cropped up as a result. Coppola has his own opinions of each, which can differ from and line up with some of the widely accepted attitudes towards each version.

The movie not only goes down in history as one of the best war movies ever made but one of the most controversial behind the scenes. Martin Sheen had a heart attack, Francis Ford Coppola fired a key actor and had a nervous breakdown, and Marlon Brando showed up overweight and underprepared. Despite the difficult time making the movie, Coppola has returned to Apocalypse Now several different times to explore the movie in new ways. However, there is still a lot of debate about which of the Apocalypse Now versions is the definitive one.

Why There Are So Many Versions Of Apocalypse Now Explained

The Troubled Production Resulted In Lots Of Footage And Changes In The Story

In 1975 Coppola was coming off a series of massive successes. He had written and directed The Godfather and its sequel along with the film The Conversation in the early 1970s. All three movies were critically and commercially successful, and they helped to solidify the New Hollywood era that began in the late 60s after the death of the old studio system. Francis Ford Coppola's next movie was a modern riff on the Joseph Conrad novel Heart of Darkness, transporting it from the Congo in the 1890s into the waning days of America's time in Vietnam.

The film follows a young army captain with PTSD who's given the assignment to venture into the jungle and assassinate a rogue American colonel who has gone insane. Written by legendary screenwriter John Milius, it was originally going to be directed by George Lucas, who chose Star Wars instead and left Coppola to take over as director. Apocalypse Now was originally supposed to be shot over five months in 1976 but, famously, the production became a disaster. The documentary Hearts of Darkness: A Filmmaker's Apocalypse details everything that went wrong. Five months of shooting became a year of shooting.

Sets were destroyed by weather, filming was interrupted by an actual civil war, and Martin Sheen had a near-fatal heart attack on set. Coppola shot over a million feet of film (a fully edited version of a typical 2-hour movie is roughly 11,000 feet of film). Understandably, it took Coppola and multiple full-time editors years to cut the footage into a presentable final product.

The myriad production issues that are part of the true story behind Apocalypse Now's creation are mainly to blame for why so many versions of the film exist, and why it was 40 years later that Apocalypse Now: Final Cut finally came out.

Apocalypse Now Theatrical Version

Coppola's Need For A Hit Prompted A Mainstream Cut

The Apocalypse Now original theatrical version came out of this tortured process. There were several "work in progress" versions of varying lengths shown to limited audiences and eventually a long version shown at the Cannes Film Festival that some loved and others hated. The entire production of this film became a media frenzy and many people thought it was going to be an absolute failure that would ruin Coppola's career. Despite the praise Apocalypse Now gained in the years since its release, the theatrical version is not the film that Coppola originally wanted to make.

Interestingly, Francis Ford Coppola has had to self-fund his films at times, and he had sunk so much money into the movie that he needed it to be a success, so Coppola consciously took out what he considered the weirder parts of the film to make sure it would appeal to a general audience.

This line of thinking paid off as Apocalypse Now was a huge box office success and has since had an enduring legacy as a modern classic. It's likely a miracle that it came out at all and even more so that its theatrical version became one of the greatest films of the 1970s.

Apocalypse Now Redux

The Reinstated Scenes Make For A Slower And More Ponderous Version

In 2001, Coppola re-edited Apocalypse Now to put all the sequences he had removed from the theatrical version back into it. Titled Apocalypse Now Redux - a retitling convention followed by The Godfather Part 3's Coda version - Coppola's new version of the film is widely considered a massive step down from the original.

Apocalypse Now Redux's differences disrupted the original film's ecology and created a bloated, slow, and uneven version...

A film's edit can be a delicate thing, and even the smallest changes can radically alter what the movie ultimately is. Apocalypse Now Redux's differences disrupted the original film's ecology and created a bloated, slow, and uneven version of Apocalypse Now that is considered much worse than the version audiences were already familiar with.

First Assembly

The First Edit Was Never Intended For Public Viewing

Another version of Apocalypse Now floated around - a bootleg copy. An assembly version is the very first edit of a film, featuring every scene that was shot, intended only for the creative team to view before the rough-cut version. Apocalypse Now's assembly cut leaked and was spread around on videotape.

It would be one of the longest Francis Ford Coppola movies of all time, coming in at 289 minutes, and it included material not featured in any other version of the film. This draft of Apocalypse Now is probably too unwieldy to be considered a good movie, but it is an interesting watch for those so inclined.

Apocalypse Now Final Cut

Coppola Addressed Criticism With Redux With A Leaner Cut

40 years after the original version of Apocalypse Now was released, Francis Ford Coppola decided not only to oversee a brand-new restoration of the film but also to create a brand-new version. The Apocalypse Now final version came out in 2019 and was a significant improvement of Apocalypse Now Redux. Coppola took in the criticisms of the Redux version and crafted a new version that trimmed back many of the added scenes or cut them out again entirely.

What was even more exciting about Apocalypse Now: Final Cut was that the new 4k transfer was made from the original film negative rather than the interpositive used in all previous transfers of the film...

This version paid much more attention to the ecology of the film and works much better than Redux. What was even more exciting about Apocalypse Now: Final Cut was that the new 4k transfer was made from the original film negative rather than the interpositive used in all previous transfers of the film, so the final version is definitely the best-looking of all the versions and is the one that Coppola himself is most proud of.

Why The Theatrical Version Is The Best Version

The Focused Story Still Feels Epic And Engrossing

While the Apocalypse Now Final Cut is a step up from the Redux, and some consider it on the same level as the original, the first theatrical version will always be the definitive version of Francis Ford Coppola's classic and it is the tightest and most focused edit, though no less bizarre even with the stranger sequences cut out.

That being said, Francis Ford Coppola's Apocalypse Now: Final Cut is still a fascinating companion piece to the original and Coppola has made all versions of the film easily available to the public, even packaging the theatrical version and Redux together in DVD releases.

The theatrical version of Apocalypse Now is the film that audiences fell in love with, and it's what became a classic piece of 1970s American cinema. The existence of the other versions doesn't create competition as to which version is best but rather serves as an opportunity for audiences to see how much a film can change by taking out, putting in, and rearranging the edited sequences. The hope is that Coppola is finally satisfied with the movie and that there's now a version of Apocalypse Now he can fully stand behind as the movie he set out to make.

Which Apocalypse Now Version Is The Longest (& Shortest)

The Length Ties Directly With The Quality Of Each Version

None of Francis Ford Coppola's versions are short, but they vary in length. The longest version is the first assembly, at 289 minutes of extremely rough footage. The theatrical version of Apocalypse Now is the shortest - at 153 minutes. It's shorter than its counterparts, even the Final Cut and Apocalypse Now Redux.

While the former version of Apocalypse Now is about 182 minutes long, the latter was 202. As in the case of the better Godfather 3: Coda cut, which trimmed four minutes off the original, shorter means better for Apocalypse Now. The theatrical version is - by far - the best version of this surreal Vietnam War classic.

The Worst Apocalypse Now Version And Why It's Redux

The French Plantation Sequence Is Hightlight's The Version's Issues

Just as the original theatrical version is regarded as the best version of Apocalypse Now, Apocalypse Now Redux is generally accepted as the worst. The film still has many strengths, and it does add interesting context to the well-known scenes and story of its predecessor. For many, however, the extended runtime of Redux prevents it from being a real contender with the theatrical release, since the main Apocalypse Now: Redux difference is its additional 49 minutes of material that don't amplify the story but bog it down instead.

The pacing of Apocalypse Now is already one of the film's more unusual aspects, and Redux draws it out to an unnecessary degree...

As an example, the additional scene in which Sheen's Willard takes his team for some hard-earned downtime while getting to know a French family might've seemed important to Coppola for providing some contrast with the rest of Apocalypse Now's oppressive bleakness, but it reduces the heavy impact of the wider film by allowing the audience some respite along with the long-suffering military men. The pacing of Apocalypse Now is already one of the film's more unusual aspects, and Redux draws it out to an unnecessary degree, especially through its more protracted political discussions.

While these add depth and timeliness for Redux's ittedly numerous fans, such extensive dialogue throws a wrench in the works of the film's already considerable runtime. Coppola fans love diving into his work, but more isn't always better, and a director can be judged as much by what they exclude from a movie as what audiences see on-screen. Redux missed this point entirely and added "more" scenes instead of "better" scenes.

Every Version Of Apocalypse Now Deserves Respect

The Faults Don't Negate The Brilliance Of Each Version Of The Movie

Apocalypse Now features several versions, but that is the case with other seminal movies in history. Apocalypse Now Redux is not much different from movies like The Godfather and Blade Runner, where there are several versions and all of them are worth watching. When wanting to see movies made at the highest levels, watch all the versions of the Coppola classic and understand how different versions of the movie offer different aspects of the same story. Each of these movies is almost a different experience, and that is why the movie has remained an iconic masterpiece.

Apocalypse Now deserves respect based on what the filmmakers, actors, and crew went through in making the movie. The civil war was going on while making the movie and more than one crew member almost died while making the movie, including lead actor Martin Sheen. There are even real corpses used instead of props in some scenes thanks to the casualties of the real war.

With all that went on, the entire movie - no matter which version - flowed like poetry and the final version didn't seem to have a wasted frame. A movie that shows the depth of the human soul, it proves war is hell.

Which Apocalypse Now Version Is Best For First-Time Viewers?

One Version Earned Apocalypse The Reputation Of An All-Time Classic

Decades later, Apocalypse Now is still discussed as one of the greatest movies ever made which naturally draws a lot of interest from fans who have never seen the classic before. However, with the many different versions available, it can be hard to decide which one is best for first-time viewers. So, when it comes to watching the version of the movie that helped it gain its reputation as a bold masterpiece, the theatrical version is the right choice.

While it is valid that Francis Ford Coppola had ways he sought to improve the movie to fit his true vision, the theatrical cut is the most concise and effective presentation of the movie's epic scale, thought-provoking commentary, and exhilarating pace. The movie achieves everything that the other versions of the movie do, but it does so in a shorter runtime and a more economical story.

Fans of the original will find it interesting to check out the versions of the movie and see the differences. However, the debate over what works and what doesn't is something to explore once a viewer has experienced the theatrical version. It is the basis for those conversations and the foundation of why Apocalypse Now is revisited so often. Had the first movie not been as interesting and compelling as it was, few people would have been interested in what other versions exist.