In recent years, Disney has come out with a slew of live-action remakes of its animated classics. From Cinderella to Aladdinfans have seen their favorite animated friends step into reality. Sometimes it's for the better, other times, it's for the worse.

RELATED: Disney/Pixar’s Brave: 10 Aspects Of Scottish Culture Explored In The Film

The new live-action remakes have somewhat of a stigma attached to them, but that doesn't mean they aren't without some redeeming qualities. Here are five fantastic elements that worked, as well as five failures that didn't.

Fantastic: Johnny Depp’s Mad Hatter

Mad Hatter

Not since Captain Jack Sparrow has Johnny Depp played a character so visually impressive and distinctly iconic. While Burton's Wonderland might not be everyone's favorite live-action adaptation, the Hatter is certainly a favorite amongst many Disney fans. Never before has there been a more wild and complex adaptation of the character. From the mercury-poisoning inspired details to Depp's mad ramblings, it's an unforgettable performance.

Fail: The Beast’s Needless CGI

Beauty and the Beast Trailer - Fighting wolves

CGI is a double-edged sword at the best of times, and Disney continues to prove that time and time again. While fans greatly enjoy their CGI animation in animated films, some live-action films tend to be too reliant on it for certain effects.

RELATED: 10 Most Uncomfortable Costumes Actors Had To Wear

With movies like Maleficent having awesome makeup work, why was this computer-generated monstrosity created">The Beast should have been the perfect palette for a monster makeup artist, and the directors went with a complete waste of pixels.

Fantastic: Maleficent’s Fantasy Creatures

maleficent-tree-giant-2014 - Edited

On the subject of CGI monstrosities, there are a certain few that are exceptions to the rule. While the film might have some Disney fans split, one can't deny the magnificence of Maleficent's monsters. Every fairy, every goblin, every horrifying tree creature that would give Groot a heart attack has a very distinct design and visually interesting presents. CGI animation might be a divisive medium, but it has its moments.

Fail: Alice in Wonderland’s Overly-Complex Plot

Alice from Live Action Alice In Wonderland

Jumping back down the rabbit hole, we return to Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland. The thing that has many Disney fans upset is that this was almost the perfect live-action remake.

RELATED: The 10 Worst Movies That Made $1 Billion, Ranked (According To IMDb)

It had the right director, it had the right cast, it had the right visual style, it had the right music, and it would have been perfect if it wasn't for one thing. The plot was convoluted and overly complex, resulting in a mish-mash mess that squashed the film. Don't even mention its sequel...

Fantastic: The Lion King’s Shenzi

Shenzi Lion King Remake

Credit to Jon Favreau as remaking one of the most beloved animated features of all time was not an easy task by any means. No matter what the guy did, he would inevitably upset somebody. Though some choices weren't the best, one of the best was breathing new life into Shenzi and the hyenas. Taking a page from nature, the hyenas were led by the malicious matriarch, Shenzi, and definitely had more of a predatory edge.

Fail: Pooh’s Dead-Eyed Stare

Christopher Robin talking to Pooh

For the record, Christopher Robin isn't a bad movie. Jim Cummings gives the performance of his life as both Tigger and Winnie the Pooh, but the problem is that... well, Pooh looks dead.

RELATED: 10 Storybook Characters Disney Should Consider Adapting

Disney attempted to combine styles by using both their version and the actual toys owned by Christopher Robin as visual guides, resulting in these uncanny versions of the characters. Pooh's black button eyes are unblinking and nonemotional, which makes for a slightly unsettling effect when paired with his soft voice.

Fantastic: Dumbo’s Pink Elephants

Pink Elephants in Dumbo

Tim Burton definitely made up for his mistakes with Alice by giving Disney fans his interpretation of DumboWhile the elements from the original are present, the overall product is indeed something new and inventive. But it wouldn't be Dumbo without a parade of pink elephants. Danny Elfman truly shines in this adaptation of the psychedelic sequence, and no elephants were drunk during production to boot.

Fail: Mary Poppins Returns' Villain

Colin Firth as the banker in Mary Poppins Returns

Mary Poppins Returns might have been a fun movie, but it was by no means perfect. It did very little things different from the original. However, one thing it did do completely on its own was creating a villain in the form of Mr. Wilkins who wants to take the Banks family house.

RELATED: Dick Van Dyke: 10 Best Movie & TV Show Roles, Ranked (According To IMDb)

The question is: who on Earth thought this was necessary? Mary Poppins is not a story that really warrants a villain, resulting in Wilkins's appearance feeling forced.

Fantastic: Glen Close’s Cruella

Cruella de Vil with two dalmatian puppies in the poster for 101 Dalmatians

Disney remakes are nothing new. In fact, one could trace them back all the way to 1996 with this reimagining of 101 DalmatiansIt's a fun film, but the best part is Glen Close's absolutely hysterical performance as Cruella de Vil. Wild doesn't even begin to describe Close's Cruella in this film. She's so engrossed in the role and blatantly enjoys it, who wouldn't with a laugh like that?

Fail: The Entirety of Pete’s Dragon

 Pete's Dragon

If there's one film that earns the bane of Disney fans everywhere, it's the sorry live-action adaptation of Pete's DragonAside from the title, it has absolutely nothing to do with the original musical. They couldn't even animate a good Eliot. The original had Don Bluth, the remake had a CGI grass stain. Did they even see the original?

NEXT:10 Best Live-Action Walt Disney Pictures Movies On Disney Plus, According To Rotten Tomatoes