An expert review of Sandra Bullock’s Directed by Alfonso Cuarón, the film stars Sandra Bullock and George Clooney as astronauts whose space mission goes catastrophically wrong and forces them to navigate the endless void of space in order to get back home to Earth.

In a video by Insider, retired NASA astronaut Nicole Stott evaluates scenes from Gravity, rating the film's portrayal of space a 5/10 on realism. Though she praises the visual accuracy of microgravity and the astronaut's movement in space, she finds other aspects lacking. Specifically, she notes that some safety protocols and Dr. Ryan Stone's (Bullock) response to fire in space as inaccurate, mentioning that astronauts would first secure a protective air mask during emergencies, which was absent in the film. Read more of Stott's perspective here:

Every astronaut, I think, who watches this is like “Oh, my gosh, the first thing you’re going to do in any fire is, before you even go to see what it is, you’re going to put on your mask.”

[Bullock] sees this other space station that she wants to get to. If she fires the fire extinguisher when she’s looking right at it and the thing goes out the back, she’s going to go in one direction or another. I don’t know that it would actually work the way they showed it in the film. The idea is good. You even hear her in the scene calculate, get to 180, and then squeeze the trigger. [Whether] the fire extinguisher would get you there or not, I don’t even want to wager a guess on that.

What This Expert Review Means For Gravity

The Challenges Of Depicting Space On Screen

Stott reviews two particularly intense scenes in Gravity. While Stott’s critique suggests that Gravity isn't perfect in of realism, it’s important to note that sci-fi dramas like Gravity often compromise scientific accuracy for narrative tension. Moreover, the retired astronaut's acknowledgment of the film's effort to capture microgravity accurately still adds legitimacy to the production, noting, "They did a pretty good job in this film, too, of showing this billowing way the fire grows inside the spacecraft."

Her insights demonstrate filmmakers' challenges when portraying complex scientific concepts without alienating audiences. For viewers unfamiliar with space operations, some liberties, like the creative use of a fire extinguisher as propulsion, or forgetting an emergency mask, can move the narrative forward, even if it's beyond scientific reality. The movie’s most redeeming quality, according to Stott, lies in its depiction of space movement. She notes, "One of the things I loved about Gravity was the visuals of the way the astronauts moved in space. It’s one of the best presentations of that I’ve ever seen."

Our Take On Gravity's Accuracy Score

The Trade-Off Between Realism & Storytelling

Though Gravity may not satisfy space experts fully, its impact extends far beyond realism. The film won seven Academy Awards, including Best Director for Alfonso Cuarón and Best Visual Effects, largely because of its immersive storytelling and technical achievement. While scientific accuracy is valuable, Gravity prioritizes emotional engagement, delivering a gripping survival story that resonates with audiences worldwide.

The movie’s portrayal of space might not be flawless, but its success lies in its ability to evoke the isolation, danger, and beauty of the cosmos. Even with some factual inconsistencies, Stott’s review confirms that the film gets certain key elements right—especially in visualizing the disorienting experience of space movement. Ultimately, Gravity strikes a rare balance of cinematic spectacle and scientific ambition, and for many viewers, that’s more than enough.

Source: Insider