The Hunger Games Books Need The Hunger Games

The Games Are The Engine That Makes The Whole Story Go

Putting it simply, the Hunger Games books won't work without their namesake. The games are the central hub around which all the other events turn; without them, the books would just be a typical story of class power struggle. The story needs the Hunger Games to establish literally everything in the universe: the world, the cruelty of the Capitol and particularly President Snow, how oppressed people, at their worst, will become as cruel as those they're fighting, like President Alma Coin. The bare-bones survival narrative of the deadly competition at the heart of every Hunger Games book is the real engine, not the political intrigue around it. The whole thing simply falls apart without the games themselves.

That said, it is a shame that the books are so inextricably linked with and titled for the Hunger Games. There are several really interesting stories that could be told after Katniss and the rebellion help topple President Snow and liberate Panem. Political and social upheaval of that magnitude doesn't magically settle down simply because the dictator is gone. Though Panem had run a cruel and oppressive system and disproportionate economy for generations, there are bound to be significant challenges in getting a new government and economy running, and plenty of stakes. But without the competition being the underpinning element, it just loses the DNA of what makes a Hunger Games story a Hunger Games story.

It Would Undo Katniss & Peeta's Ending & All They Sacrificed

Putting Panem Back Into Civil War Would Send A Bleak Message

A more in-universe story for why Suzanne Collins can never write a Hunger Games sequel is the simple fact that creating compelling stakes would require some sort of class struggle or battle on par with the emotional impact of the Hunger Games. To do that would undo everything that Katniss and Peeta sacrificed to win the games and then lead a rebellion. It's not impossible to think that might happen, but it would be unimaginably cruel for Collins to write and painful for audiences to read.

The only way a Hunger Games sequel might work is if it were set far, far into the future, when, in the timeline, Katniss and Peeta were but distant names in a Panem child's history textbook. There's always the hope that the people of Panem learned from history and built a better society, one that was not doomed to repeat its mistakes of the past. However, if human nature and history have shown, that's rarely the case, and societies and nations tend to get into cyclical patterns of peace and upheaval.

Still, while Panem regressing in a few generations, or even a few hundred years, would be the more realistic outcome, it would also be bleak. While Suzanne Collins pulled no punches regarding the brutality of human nature and the ive cruelty of the rich and powerful, the Hunger Games books ultimately ended on a note of hope. Writing a future-set sequel of Panem once again in dire straits would not only undermine everything Katniss and Peeta sacrificed, but also the hopeful ending Collins wrote. While prequels will eventually be quite limiting, The Hunger Games story has a clear endpoint and can go no further lest it risk undoing all that came before.

The Hunger Games

Created by

Suzanne Collins

First Film

The Hunger Games

The Hunger Games is a multi-movie franchise starring Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss Everdeen. The films are based on the young adult dystopian book series by author Suzanne Collins. The first film was released in 2012, followed by Catching Fire in 2013, Mockingjay Part 1 in 2014, and Mockingjay Part 2 in 2015. In 2023, the fifth film in the series was released, The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes.

Cast

Peter Dinklage, Hunter Schafer, Jason Schwartzman

See at Amazon See at Best Buy See at Walmart

Expand Collapse