Christopher Nolan's Todd Phillips' movie for Oscar success, and others panning it as anti-comic book indulgence.
Certainly, Joker is far from traditional superhero fare and anyone who goes into the theater expecting such will be left sorely disappointed. But the Clown Prince of Crime's debut solo feature is far from the only Batman movie to take a fresh approach at adapting comic book characters for the big screen. In 2005, Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight Rises.
While some might've expected Nolan's successful reinvention of the genre to trigger a new dawn for both Batman universe is finally reawakened.
The Dark Knight Was Supposed To Reinvent Superhero Cinema
To rephrase Gary Oldman's Commissioner Gordon, The Dark Knight was the superhero trilogy fans both deserved and needed following the turn of the millennium. After Marvel shopped their most popular characters to Hollywood's finest, comic book movies were catching on in a big way, with Sam Raimi's Tim Burton and Richard Donner in decades past.
With Batman Begins, Christopher Nolan began painting a superhero story for the modern era - something that felt original, groundbreaking and, at times, even dangerous. Each movie in Nolan's series was epic in scale and, for the first time in the genre, took itself very seriously. Every character and storyline was deeply-rooted in a cold realism that not only raised the stakes, but created a backdrop that mirrored the real world far better than Metropolis or Spidey's New York could. More of an auteur than previous comic book movie directors, Nolan set out to prove that his Batman could evolve beyond a fun thrill ride - that it could be visually artistic and conceptually thought-provoking.
And just as Batman began taking himself seriously, so too did audiences. Naturally, all three installments in The Dark Knight trilogy were financial hits, but they also pricked the ears of those who might've previously turned their noses up at the mere sight of a cape. The Dark Knight was nominated for 8 Oscars at the 2009 Academy Awards, with Heath Ledger awarded a posthumous Best ing Actor gong for his role as the Joker. Furthermore, the absence of The Dark Knight in the ceremony's top categories (Best Picture, Best Director) sparked such a backlash that a rule change was brought in the very next year increasing the amount of nominations to ten. Finally, superhero movies were being taken seriously, and nothing would ever be the same again...
How Movies Have Failed To Build On The Dark Knight
Given the critical and commercial achievements of The Dark Knight, many might've expected Nolan's tale of Caped Crusader vs. Agent of Chaos to herald a new era for comic book movies; a shift away from the colorful blockbusters that were beginning to fall flat, and a move towards a grittier approach that catered towards the adult market. This simply wasn't the case, and Nolan's The Dark Knight trilogy stands out as an anomaly in the history of superhero cinema, rather than a catalyst for change.
Both X-Men: The Last Stand and Spider-Man 3 had suffered critically, but rather than change tack, Fox and Sony opted to reboot their respective franchises. Meanwhile, another superhero offering that had been somewhat overshadowed by The Dark Knight in the summer of 2008 was about the trigger a true movie revolution - the Robert Downey Jr. fronted The Dark Knight, and this would continue to be the standard moving forward.
That isn't to say Nolan's darker approach was abandoned completely. The director produced Zack Snyder's Black Panther found its way into Oscar contention, but both forged their own paths, rather than taking direct influence from Nolan.
Joker Finishes What The Dark Knight Started
Fittingly, the first comic book movie to really pick up the spirit and legacy of The Dark Knight is another set within the Batman universe. Like Nolan's trilogy, Joker deliberately seeks to break away from the confines of superhero tradition and lean more towards an artistic style of filmmaking that puts it into direct contention at next year's Oscars. Additionally, Todd Phillips borrows the same 'take no prisoners' approach to realistic cinema employed by the Dark Knight trilogy, and makes no time for misplaced idealism. There's little in the way of wider franchise connections, both take inspiration from art cinema rather than popular cinema, and just as Nolan opted for a loose interpretation of the source material, so too does Joker, which is a world away from previous iterations of the character.
In many ways, Joker could perhaps be considered the next logical evolution of Nolan's approach to comic book movies. While The Dark Knight was what some might call "proper" cinema, it remained, undeniably, an action movie. Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard's grandiose score with something more macabre.
If Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight trilogy had triggered a wholesale change in how filmmakers approach adapting comic books in 2008, they'd perhaps have arrived at Joker far sooner, gradually discovering that the conventions once deemed necessary components of a superhero movie could be stripped away to great effect. Some might argue that standing alone without a deluge of imitation follow-ups actually preserves The Dark Knight's legacy, rather than diminishes it, and while this may well be true, Joker is a more than worthy successor to the torch Christopher Nolan lit. It'll be fascinating to see whether yet another defining Batman film will once again prove to be a lone rebel, rather than a trendsetter.
