I think he explains it a bit above, that the show in the later seasons starts to be not about 'Sheldon' anymore I think he means when he says 'ensemble' cast. But hey for me and you... I think that was the good part of the show... right? And maybe you and I are still watching: "George and Mandy". To me, even in reruns the show is very fun to watch. The finale of 'YS' is awesome too.

This article is completely false on many s. They have not even watched the movies. 1st) Insurrection made multiple references to using the Holodeck and Holodeck technology. The bad guys were beemed on to a Holodeck version of the ship, and they only figured out they were in their own hollowship after seeing a mistake in the projection. Plus they were using that technology from the beginning of the movie, to mask the Duck-Blind. 2nd) In Nemesis. Where was the Riker and Troi's wedding? Are we sure that it did not take place in a Hollowsuite? It was not a Betazoid traditional wedding. So the idea that this took place in a Hollowdeck is likely. I believe the article should just be deleted because of how wrong it is.

While this season has been absolutely riveting... It may get too bogged down in the Soapy-ness of Lex's lies, and not in something more entertaining. It is still an really interesting season. I think it is a stretch to see the public and the police not interested in Lex for multiple reasons. Yet they never depict law enforcement, because it's a DC show and the meta-humans are the focus. This latest episode, making it a war of PR...is interesting... it is true the 'internet' public will believe, anything. But you gotta imagine, a world with Superman, and their hero being Superman, for many years, it would be pretty hard to turn a public against him in favor of a criminal that served for many years. So I do find it hard to swallow that pill so easily. Sure a bricked thrown through the window. It's not like he was accused of 'm-lesta-tion' or something. Or hiding a pile of human bones. Yet there are bones in the closet of Lex's closet.

As with even real-life human bad guys... Do they actually serve the higher power? Or do they actually serve themselves? They generally serve their masters, as long as it is convenient for them. They will turn on their masters on a dime if it suited their needs, loyalty is generally not a thing. Conversely, for the light-side, loyalty is a religious part of the job, and they do get something out of it, in theory. In real life, those that are good, struggle to see what they get out of being loyal... Dooku, also struggled with this... That was written in the story... He saw corruption within the Jedi's moral nature, and questioned their practices, and maybe rightly so. However, his questions.. then led him too far into the evil side.

But I think the retconn is fine, in that when we see him in 'Homefront', and he has new organs... we should infer that he probably wasn't able to cook for some time prior to that. So the wording in 'Emissary' is ok. He also is a stubborn old-coot, and who knows how long he was putting off getting the procedures. He may have been bedridden. Even with the new-organs, he is counseled how much he is exerting himself.

It seems that the concept of the Father's infidelity was retconned over time, and they seemed to do a good job helping us understand the paradox between what was said earlier and what was shown later, if you paid a attention. Also, the going theory is, last I heard was that 'Penny' won't have to do any cheating, because Leonard may be deceased.. or is that changed. It was theorized that 'Leonard' was dead during the finale of 'Young Sheldon' in the memoir, but not explicitly stated.

hmm... It was the 70s, finding Holly Goodhead as an Astronaut would have been a surprise. In fact if you google-it, the first female astronauts were in the late 70s early 80s. So was Bond actually ahead of it's time (when it was written and made), by putting an attractive woman here, and having women aspire to be like her? I guess this article is written from the perspective of what still holds up today. so ok.

interesting... that would better explain the canonical issues, we always have to skirt around. There are ways to explain it, but not great ways. Retconning the ending that Palpatine and Darth Sidius as actually two characters would be better too, than what we have now. That way what died in Return of the Jedi was actually the clone, but not. I thought that at first, after seeing 'Rise of Skywalker'.

The person did say 'American' in the article. But colloquially many Americans think we don't have accents, because we generally hear about the same sounding 'Accent' from the Midwest to California and Florida. That's a tremendous population of people about all speaking generally the same 'accent', or what we think is a 'neutral' accent. Conversely if you go to Europe, there is a different accent every 10 to 20miles. Of course there are exceptions in the US, like in the South there are different sounds, or in New York city every boroughs had their own distinct sound, but not as much as they used to. As they have been mixed and they watch more TV and internet. Just to give a few accent examples. Its hard to find distinct accents among the young... It's usually the older ones that retain accents.

Here I thought he was going to bring up the retconned O'Brien character, who in 'Encounter at Farpoint' wasn't originally playing "O'Brien". In fact the character is really nameless, and credited as 'Battle Bridge Conn'. I didn't mind the retconn, and 'All Good Things' I can watch over and over again.

We love answering these types of questions on Quora. Not sure this counts as 'Biggest Mystery'. The 'In Universe' answer submitted above is as good as any, that the others were not needed...

However perhaps I could submit a better one: How were The Doctors summoned to participate? By the Tardis... By Doctor 11?. Before we even discuss "The Timeless Child". Let's just study "The Time of the Doctor" in which the original concept was that he was on his last life and generation. (at least we thought so...) But then the Time-Lords supposedly had lifted the restriction, so that as a consequence he would have more lives. By doing so, he was able to destroy the Daleks with his 'Regenerative' power. Now: Would Doctor 11 or the Tardis have much knowledge of the future Doctors? Not much. Yes, they had Doctor 12... but more than likely the farther a field, the more power it would require to reach them. Similar concepts has been depicted in Doctor Who before, such as when the Tardis has to make Time-compensation when their are two Doctors or Tardis at the same time. Or when they are using their Time-Lord power to suppress Time-related paradox. So by having more Doctors and Tardis', it would be harder to keep the Space-Time-Continuum together. Not to mention, that the Tardis may not even be able to reach or communicate with these later Doctors for them to get a signal. Because of the same dimensional issue.

As stated above, not only did Q resurrect Elnor at the end of Season 2. But in Season 3 when the Excelsior was destroyed, the producer has mused that perhaps 'Elnor' was not on-board. But was not stated as definitively as the article. So the status was left 'unknown'. To me the 'Farewell' episode of Season-2 was best when Q says goodbye. Perhaps you missed that if your saying the above. Season 3 was the most praised, but to me, it's also filled with hard to swallow 'fantasies' that are hard to see actually happening. Oh yeah, Data's back from the Dead... the old ship is back too, oh and the Voyager's Borg queen's back. It was like a soap-opera where they exclaim it's twins, to get out of a already written story line.