Wow! I don't really have much to say about this one! Great list! Like a checklist of my childhood. Most of all thank you OP for including FLCL (as if you couldnt) it's a very under appreciated series! Some of (not all) of the newer spin offs weren't bad either.

If I'm not mistaken also one of the rare instances where an anime inspired the manga. However, the manga is an absolute dumpster fire.

Really surprised with all the Jojo fans out there no one has even tried to throw Dio in the hat. The World literally stops time. If Zeno can blink to destroy Dio can freeze time cut out his eyes(lids) whatever and then Zeno is powerless. Speed, take the legs, strength, just assassinate. Same can be said against pretty much anyone. Now if he really is the strongest, I'm not really saying that...just thought someone would have brought it up and I was surprised. And regardless it's a super strong ability for sure.

Also, outside Zeno and Dio. Satoru Gojo's Infinity basically nullifies any physical ability. Also quite strong. There are waaaay too many overpowered abilities in Anime/Manga to make a "tier" list. It's more just what is your favorite.

Hmm, I'm pretty sure both Whis and Beerus have curcumvented "the rules" to help save Z-Fighters and Earth on more than 1 occasion. Other than having a really gritty personality nothing really leads me to believe Beerus is a "bad guy". Or the role of God of Destruction, for that matter.

All that is to say that, in my opinion, Beerus and Vegeta's personalities (at least as they are now) match up well and I don't think that being the lord of destruction would be counter to is growth but the cumulation to it.

However, the part that poses a problem for me is that Vegeta has a deep sense of protecting his family and being the lord of destruction probably wouldn't allow a huge amount of time for him to be safeguarding them.

Conversely, in the same sense, it would seem they are setting Goku up to be an angel. While, it would make sense that if both were the case then Goku could potentially be matched with Vegeta (if he becomes God of destruction also) and they could train ad nauseum. I don't think that would satisfy Goku either as he wants to fight as many strong opponents as possible (not just 1).

So all in all, I agree with your conclusion but my opinion differs in the reason why. And to be honest while it has been great it's probably time for them to move on past Beerus and Whis or start directly shaping the story towards them. They have played their part and both Goku and Vegeta have learned the most they can from them it's up to them now to master the training or whatever. That's just what I'd like to see. What's next for them.

Again, you're comparing a game that has been cranking out full releases for 25 years (who was started by Maxis who had many more years of simulation experience prior) to a game that has been out in BETA for 1 week. I know it's the hot topic of the moment and you have to get your clicks out of it but give InZoi a chance ffs. I'm going to keep posting this everywhere I can because EA has lost their mind releasing watered down Sims just to release multiple 40 packs to add content back into the game essentially making it a live service game with no multi-player. If you'd like to see them straighten up there has to be reasonable competition and InZoi is the best we got. So there is no reason at this point to be doing a ways Sims is better article yet imo.

I get what you are saying about the "second marty" that goes back at the end. However as explained in 2. Timelines can deviate. When he goes back at that point the timeline skews for him and he goes back to the original messed up past. When "Marty 1" comes back as Allan said that is still the same Marty but just closing the loop and your idea that the future was changed to that exact moment is probably correct. Because that is the point when time travel ceases to affect that portion of the timeline. So this conglomerated theory would be that time would only be altered in the points between time travel. Which would make some sense and unless I am missing something stays true to story? What do you all think?

Yes, but let me make this clear. They want to charge more because there is more involved in creating a more robust game with more estimated playtime. Ok, if that's the road they want to travel then any bug that should arise that hinders my progress then I would expect to compensated in kind as well. I being unable to play because of too many people being on on release of gta 5 and i think that took 2-3 days to resolve. So in that case i should be very well reimbursed. Their time isn't the only one with value. I'm not talking about a 5 million shark card for gta online either. I couldn't care less about the online mode if it's the same as last time. Also speaking of ,it seems to me that GTA V making $911M in 2020 (as reported by DigiStatement)...they are getting plenty of duly earned income out of it. That's not even counting the last four years or years prior. Considering that according to wiki it cost an estimated $265M to make...I think triple their money back in a single year not even total is plenty yes there is costs to ongoing content maintenance and upkeep but it still isnt likely comparable. Charging $100 is pure corporate greed in my opinion.