What Sony jail? Spider-Man is still part of the MCU. There's supposed to be a new film next summer, if it doesn't get delayed now that Avengers has been delayed (especially since they haven't even started filming it) He just wasn't going to be in Doomsday. For one, Tom Holland has been busy with The Odyssey then moving on to Spider-Man. There was also talk that the new movie would take place during Doomsday, so we see where Spider-Man is during the events. But unless they delay it, that may not be so likely. But it is presumed he will be in Secret Wars.

How many times in the history of Doctor Who have they brought back old villains thought to be dead. Whether it be the Master, Davros, or even Omega was brought back with the Fifth Doctor when he was thought to be destroyed in The Three Doctors. But they aren't really "gods". That was the point of The Story and the Engine. That the so-called "gods" have become that only because of the stories told about them. Omega was a legend in Time Lord lore. He also became very powerful after he entered the anti-matter world, being able to harness the power to create his own world within it. So he isn't necessarily a "god", but his power and legend make him seem like one. The same goes for the rest of the pantheon.

And what do you mean by "before she even existed"? She's always existed. She goes way back to the classic era and her, the Doctor (at least starting with the William Hartnell regen presumably), and the Master grew up together. The new regeneration is still the same person, just like the 15th Doctor is still the same person (even though he bi-generated). Mrs. Flood was Rani all along.

Yes. But she bi-generated. So we have two Ranis. Although the new Rani claims to be "THE Rani" while Mrs. Flood is "A Rani". It seems the new Rani doesn't like the personality of Mrs. Flood's regeneration, so treats her as a lesser version.

Sorry your closed-mindedness has restricted you from enjoying something. Time Lord's are alien beings who change their DNA when regenerating. That could mean look of age or hair color, so skin color isn't much of a stretch. And it could also mean gender, as it was already established before Jodie. Even the 11th Doctor thought he was a girl when he felt his long hair.

I haven't seen the movie, but the thumbnail doesn't even show what the article is even about, so I don't see that it's a spoiler. And the headline doesn't give anything away. I didn't care about seeing the movie (I haven't cared to watch them since FD2), but I was curious and didn't mind spoilers. The headline doesn't really spoil anything about the new movie. Just teases a small detail in the movie, but you wouldn't know what it meant unless you read the article.

Did you not read the article? They actually mention that fact, but this movie confirms that the deleted scene isn't canon (which is usually true for most deleted scenes in movies).

As much as I prefer Steve Rogers, I'm not against Sam Wilson. Steve gave him that mantle and he deserved it. It's also comic accurate. And how is Sam being petty? He doesn't want the Avengers name to be attached to a controversial company (possibly leaning villainous). The New Avengers wasn't Bucky, Yelena, and crew putting a team together. It's a product of Valentina and her manipulation. She named them that and is trying to put herself in power by "owning" the Avengers. That is why Sam is fighting back. As for Steve not being political, check the comics again. Being a symbol of America, he stood up even more against government doing things he did not believe in. But from the way you speak, it seems you have more beef with Anthony Mackie and the words he said that were taken out of context by right-wing media. And maybe even that he's black since you wanted to call that out about him.

It's not about being petty. The New Avengers is a product of Valentina and her company. Sam doesn't want the Avengers name to be d with such a controversial company.

You're missing that The New Avengers is a product of Valentina's company that is full of controversy. Sam doesn't want the Avengers name being tainted and used for someone else's personal gain.

It seems so many, here, don't understand Sam's motives. The New Avengers isn't just a team Bucky, Yelena, and crew came up with. It was created by Valentina and her company. One that is full of controversy. Of course Sam wouldn't want the Avengers name attached to it. His beef isn't with another Avengers team, per se, but who is using that name for their own gain.

The fact that this episode played on the idea of conspiracy theorists and why so many of these conspiracy theory sites, social media sites, and other media exist (to make money because, sadly, there is a lot of money in peddling misinformation) is why I really liked this episode. That and how we get to see what a companion goes through after being left behind (the waiting, the PTSD, the wondering "what's next for me"), made it an excellent show.

BTW, As for the Dr. Who reboot, that was misinformation in the form of an April Fools joke.

Pullman was amazing in this. I'd ever get behind a ing actor nomination for him. Nothing against Yeun, but I believe it worked out for the best as I just don't see Yeun in this role, and as the other person said, he had good chemistry with Pugh, which really mattered. And just because his dad is an actor doesn't mean he can't act. He was nominated for an Emmy (which he was also great in), and there have been many children of actors who went on to have a successful career.

I have been wondering if this could just be the beginning of Doomsday, much like Captain America's end credits was in the beginning of The Avengers. That maybe Doomsday begins in the FF universe and they have to cross universes. But the newest FF trailer shows what looks like the Earth being destroyed. It could not be that, maybe some kind of premonition or something. I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

Why not Spike and Angel? Xander may be in question since Nicholas Brennan has some personal issues and now living with a lot of health problems. But maybe they can make it work. But aren't Anya and Cordelia dead? So how are they still viable? Then again, this is a supernatural show, so anything is possible.

Even if you want to ignore the obvious issues with making Aslan female and how it changes the character, story, and meaning, why do it? It's commercial suicide. I'm not always against some gender/race swapping where it doesn't affect the story or character, and I consider myself more "woke" than "anti-woke", but I do believe it can go too far. Even if Gerwig (who I respect as a great director and was looking forward to her adaptation) has, to her mind, a great reason for gender swapping, anyone should know it would be a complete disaster and these movies will fail. It's one thing to ignore the "anti-woke" crowd because they always want to find something to complain about (Captain Marvel and the new Indiana Jones are far from "woke"), especially when the cast strong female characters, but this is a huge failure waiting to happen and makes no logical sense why Netflix would even allow it.

It isn't because it's a new actor. It's because of Disney. Since they now have distribution rights outside the UK (but not the rights to anything precious to the 14th Doctor specials), they wanted it to start with series/season 1 to avoid confusion for new viewers they hoped to attract.

What would be the result of the test screenings? To let WB know it wouldn't be successful so they they would just shelve the movie? To make any changes, they would have had to fire Phillips and re-do the entire movie. The very thing so many people complain about. Studios interfering with a director's vision. It's obvious people didn't understand his vision, but to strip it would have made the movie a bunch of nothing and just 30 minutes that would have made no point. It was the musical numbers where the movie made its point and got into Arthur's mind. It was a stylistic choice that didn't work out for the masses. But without it, they would have had to find someone else to completely rewrite, reshoot, and re-edit the movie. Maybe it would have been more successful, but maybe not a better movie. The problem is that this movie cost $200 million to make.

Considering it seems that Legends doesn't really have any ties to Cobra Kai (although they did say they received notes from the show runners), I doubt Cobra Kai's inclusion of the name mystery was meant to be resolved in the movie. However, the Cobra Kai show runners are planning a Miyagi prequel series. Since they have left much of the mystery they developed unanswered (and rightfully so for Daniel's story), I'm guessing they are planning on handling all of it in the prequel series.