I read this entire article wondering "what the hell is an MMC?" only to finally see the words "male main character" used in the last paragraph. For those of us who are not conversant with this type of shorthand, please use the full term in its first use and follow with MMC in parentheses. Then simply use the abbreviation through the rest of the essay.

Recycling old term papers is fine when the idea is interesting, but please think of the general reader when publishing them as entertainment content!

ScreenRant won't name the movies it references in its headlines (see "Daniel Craig has a chance to redeem himself after this 2007 flop with 42% on Rotten Tomatoes") but it will spoil the biggest event of a series in a headline. It's like you're TRYING to be awful.

I didn't get the impression that Valentin and Mook were involved, although I can see that being possible. I assumed it was Sritala's bodyguards and possibly Sritala herself. The way she needed to get to Bangkok implied she needed to fence the stolen jewelry for some reason.

Once again ScreenRant writes a headline that hides the subject of the article, and then spends two paragraphs not mentioning the subject of the article, hiding it below the fold. Why do you deliberately hide the fact that the article is actually about Legendborn?

Is it some sick attempt to keep us reading longer than you think we would otherwise? Please take a Journalism 101 class!