All I read here was we want story dlc we want online dlc.

It won't happen.

Pick One live with it and accept it as it is.

We live now in the realm of toxic online culture and that's what ppl want.

If the online isnt rdy at launch that's following ye same pattern as gta v and when gta v launched the base game was enough to tide the gap anyway.

The fact is that if you want dlc for story and online your not gnna get it not ever.

Ppl demanding story dlc will be disappointed bc the online

content on gta v had the shark cards which in turn brings in money used to develop the game...

Games are a business, it's not like it was back in the days of Sega mastersystems Vic 20s and commodor 64's.

Devs will put effort into what makes them money.

This is probably why they have put so much effort into the story b4 launch.

So it's likely rinse and repeat on the game release.

As far as pc goes I'd imagine 6 will be released on pc bc it's a moddable platform and is considered to be the master race platform bc of how advanced pc's can become over their console counterparts.

So unless the story dlc was repeatable for profits and unlocks like online is then rockstar won't make content for it.

What would be the point of one and done if you can literally do that same thing for online.

Add to that fact you'd need to add vehicles businesses and other content to Keep the story up to date.

The easier version is make it online and add shark cards again as micro transactions.

Why be forced to play missions solo, when you can have the option to team with your freinds and do them??

Offline is nice but can be replaced by solo session options.

As for the story if ppl want dlc then yes but doing that will take focus away from the bread and butter that gta 6 online will undoubtedly become.

Feel free to argue with me if you will but before you type anything in reply just that gta 6 is being touted as a 1 of a kind release on how much effort and it's size.

I belive the Russos and rdj are being brought back together bc they're the golden age of the mcu to say nothing of the fact that it's was their initial collaboration that started the mcu as we currently know it rolling.

Its also no secret that mcu properties such as captain marvel and the latest captain America have missed their marks drastically.

Instead of letting the franchise end after end game they've tried time and again to milk it unsuccessfully to that end they bring the goat back in to make more cash.

As for trying to explain how and that doom took starks life, I find that very very limp.

Tony stark is a hero whether he's rich or not.

If stark had no money he's clever enough to have become a rich billionaire by his own means so I don't think him taking a hard road would matter, yes he may not have become iron man but that dosnt mean he'd turn evil and become Dr doom.

No, no the better way of explaining is mulfiversal doppelganger just like the 3 spidies from their crossover movie....

The mcu literally opened the door to that possibility by simply making that movie, they've also done it with wolvrine and deadpool showcasing different versions of wolverine, one of which was Henry caville so yh that idologiy fits better than some mocked up fan story that screen rant writers think make good reading.

Its about perception pk and how the universe in question works.

We know that marvel just like dc has a multiverse, I'm thinking they'll use that approach rather than a swap of where 2 characters ended up.

Doing that changes ironman who is Tony stark into a villan literally bc it's not him on the suit it's doom all along.

It could also be done by doom seeing stark as a world hero tries to gain power by imitating him via technology maybe a hologram mask or a face morph type operation either way those 3 ways of starting the movie would work better than doom and stark being identity swapped.....

Yeah that'd have worked if they hadn't showcased rdj being doom in a press release.

The problem now is ppl will want to see rdj sporting the doom attire because they know that it's him under the mask.

@rima that's why bttf is ourroboros in its very nature.

Its got a chain of events that intersect again and again.

Who met who first lol Obv you'd think doc met marty in 1985, however in order to preserve the past marty must make certain choices.

All that being said the version of reality that exists when marty returns is different to the one he left so in theory marty frst met doc in 1985, went back disrupted it and then returned to 1985 2.0 after he was done their frst meeting changed 1

To 1955 :) all bc he needed help.

Its very timely wimey and full of huh moments but it's my personal belief that marty changed the point of by seeking doc out, even If he tried his damnedest to not alter things he really did.

Biff got screwed to be a nobody instead of his dad's boss. His brother didn't work in fast food no more his dad had written a book based on marty trying to convince him to date his mother in the past and the black trucks they saw at the start ended up being his truck by the end of the film so lots changed.

I know I missed things but it'd take far too long to list them all.

In short I think the 1985 marty accidentally created was a causal nexus bc it didn't exist in that form previously :)

OK troll detected I said 30 - 40 yrs old.

Its date of release was July 3rd 1985.

Revenge of the sith was 2005 moron that's 20 yrs diff.

So no what? You gnna try trolling that as well.

Ppl like you @marcuslw have no place on the Internet you tried to call me wrong and I span it I your face.

Ppl like you irk me immensely bc if disrespected me like that to me face well you wouldnt be laughing for long.

As for being a fan I never said I was that's another assumption you've made wrong.

I simply saw some an incorrect post about a film I used to watch as a kid nothing more.

The comment you added is toxic, trolling and a form of bullying none of which will work on me, your the exact type of snowflake I meant when I made the comment.

You literally emojied more than you made any sort of point, ppl like yourself do what you do on the Web bc if you did it in person bad things would happen to you.

That or you'd need 6 ppl behind you to gain the courage to do it.

Bit of advice @marcuslw

If you have nothing intelligent to add to a convo then stay quiet.

I've already posted here about the letter situation in the movie.

Esentislky that principle can and should be carried to everything in the movie.

On A personal note it irks me that only now are ppl trying to deep dive review a classic that's 20 - 30 years old!! Enough already.

Stop trying to destroy a bloody great series of movies just bc you need an article for your blog.

Back to the future is a cult classic there should never be a remake please god no.....

And there should t be ppl trying to take it apart.

Its a Comedy action movie and was very very well written and acted as well.

Ppl trying to figure out time travel rules?? Please go pick a lesser movie such as timecop.

Bttf needs to be left as its always been a classic that even today's snowflakes can watch and laugh at, why??

Because "I Hate Manure"