While Gladiator isn't necessarily known for its historical accuracy, there is one aspect of the film that received tremendous praise from an expert on Roman history. One of the most popular films of its genre, Ridley Scott's historical epic follows the story of Maximus, a betrayed Roman general who finds himself fighting for his life in the gladiatorial pit. He rises up through the games, seeking revenge on the corrupt Roman emperor, Commodus, played by Joaquin Phoenix.
The film takes many creative liberties with its characters. For example, the actions of Maximus in Gladiator have massive ramifications for the Roman Empire's future, which is obviously a huge problem in a historical sense since they were made up for the movie. Not only that, but many other characters, such as Marcus Aurelius and Lucilla are just fictionalized caricatures of their real life counterparts. The movie went even further with Russell Crowe's Maximus, who didn't even exist in real life.
Russell Crowe's Maximus Embodied The True Roman Soldier
In an EW interview with classics experts that answers some questions about the accuracy of Gladiator, Roman history experts confirm the fictitious nature of the movie's Maximus character. That said, though, Maximus is still said to be a realistic invention of the film. "The virtue of the Roman soldier was depicted very well," explained one of the experts. While Maximus may not be real, he embodies much of what defined the values of a proper Roman general: valor, courage, strength, and character. His leadership is one of his most alluring qualities for viewers, which can be seen throughout the film, be it in war against the Germanic tribes, or his opponents in the Colosseum.
This aspect of the movie is almost more impactful than having Maximus be a real, historical figure. Real or not, Maximus represents the best of the Roman soldiers, and in a sense, the best of the Romans. Commodus, on the other hand, represents the worst, as one of the many cruel emperors that would sit the throne. He is depicted as caring little for the people of Rome's vast territories, leaving that work to corrupt politicians in the senate. Gladiator doesn't need complete historical accuracy to send its message about power and corruption, which are fundamental parts of the legacy left by this period in Roman history.
Why Gladiator Is Revered Despite Being So Historically Inaccurate
Gladiator is epic in scale, but unlike many historical films, doesn't center around a war or giant battles. The film is revered primarily for its entertainment factor, and almost follows similar patterns to an underdog sports movie. Maximus is likable and easy to root for, whereas Commodus is despicable in a number of ways. The historical commentary on Rome and the misuse of power is a timeless narrative, making the actual historical accuracy of the film less relevant.
Source: EW
