Been saying this for decades.

It’s less a weakness and more a “he’s as vulnerable as normal people,” it’s an area where his super powers don’t give him an advantage against magic. Those people who do have some resistance to magic do so because of the latent HomoMagi DNA, which is Earth-specific.

I stopped reading when I saw the writer couldn’t be bothered to check his dates and listed Garrison as ing in 2023 not 2024. It wasn’t the only sloppy claim, just the most offensive.

I wish I could say the quality shocked me, but it does not. ScreenRant writers don’t seem to have an editorial standard to meet, so they don’t have one to miss.

The amount of misinformation and straight up untruths when the topic is movies or comic books, etc., is aggravating.

But when SR clearly doesn’t care of getting right factual details about real people? Forget it.

I’m sure SR is making money regardless of their terrible output. It’s too bad it’s at the cost of quality, integrity, and basic standards. There are people out there who do care and who know more about these topics off the top of their heads while still understanding you always with evidence and check your facts.

I’m cool with how Lizzie was born and I’m glad Diana is back to her original origin.

Does anyone know if Donna is still the “clay” girl or is she back to being Diana’s magical mirror-image playmate stolen by Dark Angel?

Here’s a thought.

If editorial is unwilling to hire someone actually knows comic books/superheroes, and how to write/report on them, maybe stop with it.

It’s unprofessional to continually misrepresent a subject that can be fact checked in 10 minutes or fewer. Never mind the tortured grammar, tense and voice inconsistencies, and using words that absolutely do not mean what the writer thinks they mean, just require a fracking spellcheck before publishing.

Either take this genre and it’s audience seriously or just stop covering it.